The (Not So) Glorious Revolution
March 9, 2008 by Christian
“The diminished and impoverished Crown could no longer stand. It fought against the new wealth the struggle of the Civil Wars; it was utterly defeated; and when a final settlement was arrived at in 1660 you have all the realities of power in the hands of a small powerful class of wealthy men, the King still surrounded by the forms and traditions of his old power, but in practice a salaried puppet. And in that social world which underlies all political appearances, the great dominating note was that a few wealthy families had got hold of the bulk of the means of production in England, while the same families exercised all local administrative power and were moreover the Judges, the Higher Education, the Church, and the generals. They quite overshadowed what was left of central government in this country.”
~ Hilaire Belloc, The Servile State, pp. 67-68.
Socialism is death.
http://sinblancaporelmundo.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/una-imagen-una-palabra/
I’m not sure of your point in reference to this post, but you’ll be happy to know that Belloc fully agrees with you. He just thinks that Capitalism is death as well. As an aside, it seems that you may suffer from a lack of ability to think of any alternatives to either state socialism or capitalism.
Actually, you might be right. I had only thought about the possibility of capitalism. I cannot concerive another economic system, I´m afraid.