<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for My Diaspora</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amondstien.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amondstien.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Notes From a Thinned-Out Life</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Vision by Drew</title>
		<link>http://amondstien.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/the-vision/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amondstien.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Good thoughts Ammo. This is an idea that is expanded in both her Declaration and in the Need for Roots.  The difference with Marx's dialectic is her Platonic scripting of how one receives the Good.  Labor as she conceives can result in affliction since it crushes the ability to receive the Good and so, dehumanizes.

I also think of Heidegger's notion of "standing reserve" along these lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts Ammo. This is an idea that is expanded in both her Declaration and in the Need for Roots.  The difference with Marx&#8217;s dialectic is her Platonic scripting of how one receives the Good.  Labor as she conceives can result in affliction since it crushes the ability to receive the Good and so, dehumanizes.</p>
<p>I also think of Heidegger&#8217;s notion of &#8220;standing reserve&#8221; along these lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Vision by Ammo</title>
		<link>http://amondstien.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/the-vision/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Ammo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amondstien.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Robb,

The key for Weil, a key she finds in Marx, is, “the degrading division of labour into intellectual and manual labor.”  This division occurs as much now as it did then, as much with white collar as with blue collar labor.  The division is not between work that uses ones whole body vs. work that uses ones mind and fingers.  The division is between those who plan and those you work.  It's a division between those who design and manage and those who carry out the laborious functions of work... without input into the how or the why of what they do.  I think that both Weil and Marx have much to say to today's workforce, but let us not forget that while we in the affluent sectors of the globe may have traded in our hammers and cycles for keyboards and mice, there are still those out there who mine our resources, make our clothes, and pick our food.  So though the the nature of the industry we see and aspire to has become white collar this means neither that menial blue collar labor has ceased to exist nor that white collar industry is beyond the scope of a Marxist critique.  

In regards to the former of these two points, check out Jamie Smith's most recent post: http://forsclavigera.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robb,</p>
<p>The key for Weil, a key she finds in Marx, is, “the degrading division of labour into intellectual and manual labor.”  This division occurs as much now as it did then, as much with white collar as with blue collar labor.  The division is not between work that uses ones whole body vs. work that uses ones mind and fingers.  The division is between those who plan and those you work.  It&#8217;s a division between those who design and manage and those who carry out the laborious functions of work&#8230; without input into the how or the why of what they do.  I think that both Weil and Marx have much to say to today&#8217;s workforce, but let us not forget that while we in the affluent sectors of the globe may have traded in our hammers and cycles for keyboards and mice, there are still those out there who mine our resources, make our clothes, and pick our food.  So though the the nature of the industry we see and aspire to has become white collar this means neither that menial blue collar labor has ceased to exist nor that white collar industry is beyond the scope of a Marxist critique.  </p>
<p>In regards to the former of these two points, check out Jamie Smith&#8217;s most recent post: <a href="http://forsclavigera.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://forsclavigera.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Vision by Robb Beck</title>
		<link>http://amondstien.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/the-vision/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amondstien.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-232</guid>
		<description>In running counter to sinews of capitalism that Weil describes, can we in good faith still leverage this critique in our so called technological age?  Maybe not so much "can" but "how?" In moving away from brute and brawn and shovels to a world of data programmers plugging and sorting information into massive mainframes, would the call to "workers of the world unite" still resonate?  I realize there's the post-Marxists philosophies out there trying to address these issues.  Yet can we re-incarnate the Weils, the Ruskin's, and the Chesterton's in this sense?  Just some early Sunday thoughts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In running counter to sinews of capitalism that Weil describes, can we in good faith still leverage this critique in our so called technological age?  Maybe not so much &#8220;can&#8221; but &#8220;how?&#8221; In moving away from brute and brawn and shovels to a world of data programmers plugging and sorting information into massive mainframes, would the call to &#8220;workers of the world unite&#8221; still resonate?  I realize there&#8217;s the post-Marxists philosophies out there trying to address these issues.  Yet can we re-incarnate the Weils, the Ruskin&#8217;s, and the Chesterton&#8217;s in this sense?  Just some early Sunday thoughts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HCS Seniors. by ryrythecoolguy</title>
		<link>http://amondstien.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/hcs-seniors/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>ryrythecoolguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amondstien.wordpress.com/?p=60#comment-221</guid>
		<description>nice job senior class, but just remember.. MY class set all of the faculty's desktops to pictures of narwhals and put a sports bra on the knight in pugerude's office, among other things.  and then i made a myspace for mr. johnson.  big shoes! ;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice job senior class, but just remember.. MY class set all of the faculty&#8217;s desktops to pictures of narwhals and put a sports bra on the knight in pugerude&#8217;s office, among other things.  and then i made a myspace for mr. johnson.  big shoes! ;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HCS Seniors. by Ammo</title>
		<link>http://amondstien.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/hcs-seniors/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Ammo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 14:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amondstien.wordpress.com/?p=60#comment-220</guid>
		<description>I'm afraid this was not my idea. Although I can see how you might think it was.  I do like flowers (as do you, if I remember correctly, Drew).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid this was not my idea. Although I can see how you might think it was.  I do like flowers (as do you, if I remember correctly, Drew).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HCS Seniors. by Drew</title>
		<link>http://amondstien.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/hcs-seniors/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amondstien.wordpress.com/?p=60#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Um, I think they may have struck Xn. Is the new format for your website your idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, I think they may have struck Xn. Is the new format for your website your idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Jesus Can Beat-up Your Jesus by ryrythecoolguy</title>
		<link>http://amondstien.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/my-jesus-can-beat-up-your-jesus/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>ryrythecoolguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amondstien.wordpress.com/?p=59#comment-217</guid>
		<description>ricky bobby likes to imagine jesus as baby jesus.  driscoll likes chuck norris jesus.  i prefer hipster douchebag jesus.  

nah but seriously, nice work taking rubin to task over at halden's.. a thing of beauty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ricky bobby likes to imagine jesus as baby jesus.  driscoll likes chuck norris jesus.  i prefer hipster douchebag jesus.  </p>
<p>nah but seriously, nice work taking rubin to task over at halden&#8217;s.. a thing of beauty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Jesus Can Beat-up Your Jesus by R.O. Flyer</title>
		<link>http://amondstien.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/my-jesus-can-beat-up-your-jesus/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>R.O. Flyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amondstien.wordpress.com/?p=59#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Although you might get a little flack for making this association, I suppose this actually gets right to the heart of the matter. If we fail to see that the character of God's power and strength is revealed in the powerlessness and weakness of Jesus, we miss the meaning of the gospel. I'm afraid the sentiment of this quote runs quite deeply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although you might get a little flack for making this association, I suppose this actually gets right to the heart of the matter. If we fail to see that the character of God&#8217;s power and strength is revealed in the powerlessness and weakness of Jesus, we miss the meaning of the gospel. I&#8217;m afraid the sentiment of this quote runs quite deeply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Memed? by Christian</title>
		<link>http://amondstien.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/memed/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amondstien.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

I think I might take you up on your offer.  

You're so nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>I think I might take you up on your offer.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re so nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Memed? by My First Meme (Dawkins would be proud)&#8230; &#171; Sub Specie Aeterni</title>
		<link>http://amondstien.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/memed/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>My First Meme (Dawkins would be proud)&#8230; &#171; Sub Specie Aeterni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amondstien.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-213</guid>
		<description>[...] First Meme (Dawkins would be&#160;proud)&#8230;  I guess I have been memed by Christian, so I better follow the meta-rules of blogdom and play my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First Meme (Dawkins would be&nbsp;proud)&#8230;  I guess I have been memed by Christian, so I better follow the meta-rules of blogdom and play my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
